Reviewer Guidelines
At Potroput (পত্রপুট), we value the important role that reviewers play in maintaining the quality and integrity of published research. These guidelines are designed to help reviewers understand their responsibilities and provide constructive feedback to authors. Please read these instructions carefully before accepting a review invitation.
Reviewer Responsibilities
Confidentiality
Treat all manuscripts as confidential. Do not share or discuss with others.
Objectivity
Provide unbiased evaluation. Support criticisms with evidence.
Timeliness
Respond promptly and complete reviews within the specified timeframe.
Conflict of Interest
Declare any conflicts of interest. Recuse if necessary.
Competence
Review only in areas of expertise. Seek guidance if uncertain.
Integrity
Identify ethical concerns. Report suspected misconduct.
Review Process
Receive Invitation
You will receive an email invitation to review a manuscript. Please respond within 48 hours.
Accept or Decline
Accept if you have the expertise and time. Decline if you have conflicts of interest or lack expertise.
Review Manuscript
Read the manuscript carefully. Evaluate methodology, results, and significance. Take notes for your review.
Submit Review
Complete the review form, provide detailed feedback, and make recommendations to the editor.
Revision Review
If invited, review the revised manuscript to ensure all comments have been addressed.
What to Evaluate
Originality & Novelty
Is the research original? Does it contribute new knowledge to the field?
Methodology
Is the methodology appropriate and well-described? Are the methods sound?
Results & Analysis
Are the results clearly presented? Is the analysis appropriate?
Discussion & Conclusion
Are the findings properly discussed? Are conclusions supported by evidence?
References
Are references relevant and current? Are they properly cited?
Clarity & Structure
Is the manuscript well-written and logically structured?
Ethical Compliance
Does the research follow ethical guidelines? Are conflicts declared?
Significance & Impact
What is the significance of the research? What impact will it have?
Tips for Reviewers
Be Constructive
Provide feedback that helps authors improve. Focus on the science, not the person.
Be Specific
Provide specific examples and page numbers for your comments. Avoid vague statements.
Be Fair
Evaluate the manuscript objectively. Avoid personal bias or prejudice.
Be Timely
Complete your review within the agreed timeframe. Request extension if needed.
Be Professional
Use professional language. Respect the authors and their work.
Stay Updated
Keep up with COPE guidelines and industry best practices for peer review.
Ethical Considerations
Confidentiality
Maintain strict confidentiality. Do not discuss the manuscript with others.
Conflict of Interest
Declare any conflicts of interest. Recuse yourself if necessary.
Objectivity
Provide unbiased evaluation. Focus on scientific merit.
Data Privacy
Respect data privacy and confidentiality of authors.